Jesus (7eab6364)
Acts of the ApostlesJesus is the central figure through whom Luke–Acts connects God’s Realm with a widening witness to the nations. The book presents him not only as the one whose death and resurrection mark the way toward that Realm, but also as its embodied presence: his refusal of vengeance, his works of good and liberation, and his authority over all stand in contrast to coercive power. After his resurrection, his appearance to Saul commissions a former persecutor for the gentile mission, while Peter’s testimony carries the account of Jesus into a gentile household.
Identity and Mission
In the account of the Samaritan refusal, Jesus is traveling with his face set toward Jerusalem: he is determined to continue toward the city. When the Samaritans do not receive him, James and John propose calling down fire from heaven to consume them. Jesus rebukes his disciples rather than authorizing their retaliation. The episode establishes a consequential contrast between rejection and vengeance: refusal does not license violence, and the Samaritans whom Jesus’ disciples would destroy are people whom the Lukan story wants in a position to receive those disciples later in Acts.
That moment also connects the Gospel’s journey toward Jerusalem with the later movement of the witness beyond it. Jesus does not erase the division between Samaritans and his followers by force. Instead, his rebuke holds open the possibility of a different encounter. The narrative’s direction is therefore both geographical and ethical: the mission is to reach communities once met with rejection, not to punish them for it.
The Risen Christ Calls Saul
The appearance of the risen Christ to Saul is a turning point in the direction of the witness. Acts places Saul’s call after his approval of the vigilante action against Stephen and his role in securing authority to imprison followers of Jesus. The account describes a change in the status of the persecution: what began with violence by a crowd becomes legally sanctioned harassment, with letters from the high priest authorizing Saul to bring disciples to Jerusalem. Against that history, the risen Christ’s appearance communicates that Saul’s new role has divine authorization.
The episode is described as a Christophany, a dramatic manifestation of the risen Christ, and is compared with manifestations of God to figures such as Abraham, Moses, Elisha, Isaiah, and Ezekiel. The comparison places Saul’s call within the tradition of prophetic commissioning. Its exceptional form serves a particular narrative purpose: it assures the audience that God has called someone who had ravaged the community. The account does not make a dramatic manifestation a standard requirement for leadership; other servants are selected by the community in response to the Spirit’s leading.
Calling this episode a “conversion” can obscure the historical and theological frame. In Luke’s setting, Christianity had not yet emerged as a religion distinct from Judaism, so the language of leaving one religion for another is misleading. Saul is called to a particular mission, in a pattern likened to God’s calls to Israel’s prophets. The distinction matters because the narrative presents continuity with Israel’s tradition, not a simple departure from it.
With Saul’s call, the witness begins to turn toward the gentiles, as Acts 1:8 had prescribed. Cornelius is the first gentile brought into the community through Peter, but Saul—later known as Paul—becomes the pioneering figure in the mission that occupies much of the rest of Acts. The call thus changes the trajectory of the narrative: a persecutor becomes an agent in the expansion of the witness.
Jesus and the Realm of God
Peter’s speech in the house of Cornelius interprets Jesus’ death and resurrection in the setting of visions that have prepared the way for a gentile audience. Its central claim is that the message God sent to Israel through Jesus concerns the presence and coming of the Realm of God. Because Cornelius is a centurion serving in the army that represses the Mediterranean world, Peter’s account also gives the proclamation a political edge: Jesus, not Caesar, is “ruler of all.” The scope of that claim reaches across the boundary between Israel and the gentiles and challenges imperial claims to encompassing rule.
Peter recalls that John the Baptist announced that God would anoint Jesus with the Holy Spirit and power. Jesus then “went about doing good,” casting out demons and embodying the Realm in action. This is more than a summary of exemplary conduct: it ties Jesus’ ministry to the divine power and presence that the speech proclaims. Peter’s gentile listeners are asked to trust this account on the testimony of Peter and the other apostles, who witnessed the events he describes.
The death and resurrection of Jesus are presented as milestones on the way to the Realm, with the gentile mission among its defining features. Peter recounts that Jesus was put to death and that the apostles witnessed him risen. In the presence of his gentile audience, Peter uses the ambiguous pronoun “they” for those responsible for Jesus’ death. The account notes the rhetorical delicacy: Jewish leaders were complicit, but gentiles alone possessed the power to impose capital punishment. Peter’s diplomacy keeps his listeners engaged, while leaving a live question about whether avoiding offense can also spare an audience from confronting its own complicity.
Witness, Resurrection, and the Coming Banquet
The resurrection is the decisive sign that Jesus’ ministry embodied the Realm. Peter says that the apostles not only witnessed the risen Jesus but ate and drank with him. Their shared meal gives the testimony a concrete form and anticipates the eschatological banquet. The movement from reported ministry, through death, to eating and drinking with the risen Jesus gathers the speech’s claims into a single arc: the Realm is present in Jesus’ works and points toward a future in which death has not had the final word.
The larger Lukan narrative underscores the importance of that death and resurrection through repetition. Jesus predicts them three times in Luke, but the disciples do not understand their significance even after repeated opportunities. The repetitions affirm that these events are essential to the coming of the Realm; Peter’s later speech supplies a clearer interpretation, placing them within the mission to gentiles. Thus the risen Jesus remains the center of a witness that moves outward: from Jerusalem toward the nations, from remembered deeds toward apostolic testimony, and from the experience of resurrection toward the promised fullness of God’s Realm.